MEDIATION ROLE OF AUDIT GOING CONCERN OPINION ON CORRELATION OF AUDIT TENURE AND MARKET PERFORMANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47312/aar.v4i01.221Abstract
This study aims to obtain empirical evidence of the mediating role of going concern opinion audit on the relationship of audit tenure with company market performance. This research is explanatory. The subjects in this study were companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2007 to 2017. The samples in this study were 245 companies. The type of data used is quantitative data. The statistical analysis method uses path analysis with SPSS 13. The results of the study show that going concern audit opinion has a significant negative relationship in mediating audit tenure and company market performance. These results indicate that going concern audit opinion has information that is useful for users' financial data to make financial decisions.
Keywords: Audit Tenure, Going Concern Audit Opinion, Market PerformanceDownloads
References
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Mark, B. (2014). Auditing and assurance services: an integrated approach: Boston: Prentice-Hall.
Blay, A. D., Geiger, M. A., & North, D. S. (2011). The auditor's going-concern opinion as a communication of risk. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 77-102.
Bonner, S. E., & Lewis, B. L. (1990). Determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Research, 1-20.
Brunelli, S. (2018). Audit Reporting for Going Concern Uncertainty: Global Trends and the Case Study of Italy: Springer.
Callen, J. L., & Fang, X. (2016). Crash Risk and the Auditor‐Client Relationship. Contemporary Accounting Research.
Dunham, K. (2002). Firms that want to switch auditors find it takes time, money and faith. Wall Street Journal Online.
Fleak, S. K., & Wilson, E. R. (1994). The incremental information content of the going-concern audit opinion. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 9(1), 149-166.
Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125-152.
Geiger, M. A., & Raghunandan, K. (2002). Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 67-78.
Ghosh, A., & Moon, D. (2005). Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 585-612.
Gibson, C. H. (2013). Financial reporting and analysis: Using financial accounting information: South-Western Pub.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). RE Anderson Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective: New Jersey, Pearson Prentice Hall,).
Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Willekens, M. (2014). The Routledge companion to auditing: Routledge.
Jackson, A. B., Moldrich, M., & Roebuck, P. (2008). Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(5), 420-437.
Knechel, W. R., & Vanstraelen, A. (2007). The relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality implied by going concern opinions. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), 113-131.
Limperg, T. (1985). The social responsibility of the auditor: Limperg Instituut.
Jorjani, M., & Safari Gerayeli, M. (2018). Auditor tenure and stock price volatility: The moderating role of auditor industry specialization.
Myers, J. N., Myers, L. A., & Omer, T. C. (2003). Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review, 78(3), 779-799.
Needles, B. E., Powers, M., & Crosson, S. V. (2013). Principles of accounting: Cengage Learning.
O'Clock, P., & Devine, K. (1995). An investigation of framing and firm size on the auditor's going concern decision. Accounting and Business Research, 25(99), 197-207.
O'Reilly, D. M. (2009). Do investors perceive the going-concern opinion as useful for pricing stocks? Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(1), 4-16.
Pratoomsuwan, T. (2012). The effect of an audit firm's brand on security pricing. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 7(4), 430-442.
Soltani, B. (2000). Some empirical evidence to support the relationship between audit reports and stock prices—the French case. International journal of auditing, 4(3), 269-291.
Su, L., Zhao, X., & Zhou, G. (2015). Auditor tenure and stock price idiosyncratic volatility: The moderating role of industry specialization. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(2), 147-166.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
